Question:
>Find somewhere quiet to sleep within the airport
Why do visions of that nice lady from Air Lingus on the Airport program who goes around looking at people sleeping in the terminal come to mind?
Response:
> I will have a 10 hour layover in London on my way back from Madrid [
flying to DFW ]. Plane from > Barajas arrives at Heathrow aboput midnight, plane to DFW leaves at 10 Am > Any recommendatrion on where to stay ? Reasonable priced hotels ????
IBIS Heathrow is OK. I stayed there once. About 65 pounds, good by London standards. Address : 112-114 Bath Road Hayes Middlesex UB3 5AL LONDON UNITED KINGDOM Tel : (+44)208/7594888 Fax : (+44)208/5647894 You can book at www.ibishotel.com or through agents. begin 666 px.gif ` end
Response:
> >I will have a 10 hour layover in London on my way back from Madrid [ flying to DFW ]. Plane from >Barajas arrives at Heathrow aboput midnight, plane to DFW leaves at 10 Am >Any recommendatrion on where to stay ? Reasonable priced hotels ???? > Since recommended arrival time for LGW and LHR international departures is now 3 > hours prior to flight time, you won’t have much spare time to get to any hotel > other than ones in the immediate vicinity. Even then it will be a short night…
And there are NO ‘reasonably-priced hotels’ within reach of Heathrow (nearest are probably in Slough). Find somewhere quite to sleep within the airport, or else spend a lot of money on an airport hotel, or a lot of money on taxi rides to get to Slough and back. Otherwise, your only hope is a special offer at an airport hotel through an on-line booking service.
Response:
> > Often BA and Virgin are cheaper. Then again it is not worth it if AA > work out 75 dollars cheaper. They are not that bad, but if you have a > choice they are definately bottom of the pile! > You mentioned bad service and "horrible food". > I rarely think of food as being worth $75 for a flight. > I don’t know what kind of service you are looking for in Economy. I > find little difference between AA and BA there. If I ask for a drink, I > get it. What other service are you looking for? > I rarely fly economy to Europe anymore, as I usually spend the miles for > the upgrade from the US West Coast.
Actually I had acknowledged that if an AA flight was $75 dollars cheaper I would take it. I am not here to have an argument, this is simply my opinion. Indeed I have many frequent flier miles with AA and find they provide adequate service. I simply find Virgin and BA to provide a better, more professional service and it starts the trip/vacation off on a better tone.
Response:
>I will have a 10 hour layover in London on my way back from Madrid [ flying to DFW ]. Plane from >Barajas arrives at Heathrow aboput midnight, plane to DFW leaves at 10 Am >Any recommendatrion on where to stay ? Reasonable priced hotels ????
Since recommended arrival time for LGW and LHR international departures is now 3 hours prior to flight time, you won’t have much spare time to get to any hotel other than ones in the immediate vicinity. Even then it will be a short night…
Response:
I will have a 10 hour layover in London on my way back from Madrid [ flying to DFW ]. Plane from Barajas arrives at Heathrow aboput midnight, plane to DFW leaves at 10 Am Any recommendatrion on where to stay ? Reasonable priced hotels ????
Response:
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> > As someone who has flown between NYC and London over 30 times, mostly > > on BA, Virgin or AA – I would put AA in a firm 3rd, and Virgin and BA > > fight it out among themselves!! BA is better service, Virgin better > > food and entertainments. Both are excellent! > > Try not to go AA though…. > Not even for the extra legroom? > If leg room is the only consideration then sure! I give equal or more > importance to good inflight entertainment, good food, free drinks and > over all, good flight attendants. AA has good leg room and probably > decent inflight entertainment for coach class in their 777s. But BA > and Virgin provide far better food and drink service, decent IFE > (Virgin’s better than BA) and BA fight attendants are the best of all > three. It comes down to what is important to you. American passengers > generally give a rats ass about inflight food and drinks (which is why > their airlines have gotten away with so much cost cutting). European > and certainly Asian travellers give very high importance to food, > drinks, IFE and attitude of the flight attendants. > Happy Flying. > Riaz
I have never flown on Virgin Atlantic but I have flown Transatlantic many times on BA, AA, United, US Airways, Delta, Sabena (now only a memory). NorthWest, KLM. All in economy/coach/steerage. I find AA generally to be better than BA (I like their UK and European product but have less than happy memories of their Transatlantic service) and I like KLM best of all. And the IFE on KLM AMS-LAX is almost non-existent but it is a good opportunity to read. JohnT
Response:
> Often BA and Virgin are cheaper. Then again it is not worth it if AA > work out 75 dollars cheaper. They are not that bad, but if you have a > choice they are definately bottom of the pile!
You mentioned bad service and "horrible food". I rarely think of food as being worth $75 for a flight. I don’t know what kind of service you are looking for in Economy. I find little difference between AA and BA there. If I ask for a drink, I get it. What other service are you looking for? I rarely fly economy to Europe anymore, as I usually spend the miles for the upgrade from the US West Coast.
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->> > As someone who has flown between NYC and London over 30 times, mostly >> > on BA, Virgin or AA – I would put AA in a firm 3rd, and Virgin and BA >> > fight it out among themselves!! BA is better service, Virgin better >> > food and entertainments. Both are excellent! >> > Try not to go AA though…. >> Not even for the extra legroom? > If leg room is the only consideration then sure! I give equal or more > importance to good inflight entertainment, good food, free drinks and > over all, good flight attendants. AA has good leg room and probably > decent inflight entertainment for coach class in their 777s. But BA > and Virgin provide far better food and drink service, decent IFE > (Virgin’s better than BA) and BA fight attendants are the best of all > three. It comes down to what is important to you. American passengers > generally give a rats ass about inflight food and drinks (which is why > their airlines have gotten away with so much cost cutting). European > and certainly Asian travellers give very high importance to food, > drinks, IFE and attitude of the flight attendants. > Actually, as it turns out, I’m going AA. ;-) > When I fly, I don’t especially care much about the food > or entertainment, since I’m typically asleep within a few > minutes of takeoff. ( Or, for those occasional long > periods on the runway, before hand… ) All I ask is > a bottle of water and perhaps a piece of fruit. And I bring > those myself, anyhow. > Even when I’ve flown first or business, > transcontinentally, I don’t see why people are so hung > up on the food. You’re still basically getting warmed-over > food in a less-than-pleasing environment – after all, > wouldn’t you complain if you were in a fine, groundside > restaurant, but your seats vibrated, your table > was no larger than a school desk, and there was a constant > roar coming from a few feet away? > – Rich
Please don’t get me wrong, AA are fine, but I personally prefer BA and Virgin. Take your own food and a good book (and sleeping drugs!!) and you are all set! Happy travels!
Response:
> > As someone who has flown between NYC and London over 30 times, mostly > on BA, Virgin or AA – I would put AA in a firm 3rd, and Virgin and BA > fight it out among themselves!! BA is better service, Virgin better > food and entertainments. Both are excellent! > Try not to go AA though…. > Not even for the extra legroom?
Only for the frequent flier miles!! The legroom does not make up for the bad service and the awful food. It just doesn’t set your holiday off on the right note. Usually from NYC if you pay 20-40dollars more you can go BA or Virgin and it is worth the difference. Often BA and Virgin are cheaper. Then again it is not worth it if AA work out 75 dollars cheaper. They are not that bad, but if you have a choice they are definately bottom of the pile!
Response:
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> > As someone who has flown between NYC and London over 30 times, mostly > > on BA, Virgin or AA – I would put AA in a firm 3rd, and Virgin and BA > > fight it out among themselves!! BA is better service, Virgin better > > food and entertainments. Both are excellent! > > Try not to go AA though…. > Not even for the extra legroom? > If leg room is the only consideration then sure! I give equal or more > importance to good inflight entertainment, good food, free drinks and > over all, good flight attendants. AA has good leg room and probably > decent inflight entertainment for coach class in their 777s. But BA > and Virgin provide far better food and drink service, decent IFE > (Virgin’s better than BA) and BA fight attendants are the best of all > three. It comes down to what is important to you. American passengers > generally give a rats ass about inflight food and drinks (which is why > their airlines have gotten away with so much cost cutting). European > and certainly Asian travellers give very high importance to food, > drinks, IFE and attitude of the flight attendants.
Actually, as it turns out, I’m going AA. ;-) When I fly, I don’t especially care much about the food or entertainment, since I’m typically asleep within a few minutes of takeoff. ( Or, for those occasional long periods on the runway, before hand… ) All I ask is a bottle of water and perhaps a piece of fruit. And I bring those myself, anyhow. Even when I’ve flown first or business, transcontinentally, I don’t see why people are so hung up on the food. You’re still basically getting warmed-over food in a less-than-pleasing environment – after all, wouldn’t you complain if you were in a fine, groundside restaurant, but your seats vibrated, your table was no larger than a school desk, and there was a constant roar coming from a few feet away? – Rich
Response:
> > As someone who has flown between NYC and London over 30 times, mostly > on BA, Virgin or AA – I would put AA in a firm 3rd, and Virgin and BA > fight it out among themselves!! BA is better service, Virgin better > food and entertainments. Both are excellent! > Try not to go AA though…. > Not even for the extra legroom?
If leg room is the only consideration then sure! I give equal or more importance to good inflight entertainment, good food, free drinks and over all, good flight attendants. AA has good leg room and probably decent inflight entertainment for coach class in their 777s. But BA and Virgin provide far better food and drink service, decent IFE (Virgin’s better than BA) and BA fight attendants are the best of all three. It comes down to what is important to you. American passengers generally give a rats ass about inflight food and drinks (which is why their airlines have gotten away with so much cost cutting). European and certainly Asian travellers give very high importance to food, drinks, IFE and attitude of the flight attendants. Happy Flying. Riaz
Response:
As someone who has flown between NYC and London over 30 times, mostly on BA, Virgin or AA – I would put AA in a firm 3rd, and Virgin and BA fight it out among themselves!! BA is better service, Virgin better food and entertainments. Both are excellent! Try not to go AA though….
Response:
> As someone who has flown between NYC and London over 30 times, mostly > on BA, Virgin or AA – I would put AA in a firm 3rd, and Virgin and BA > fight it out among themselves!! BA is better service, Virgin better > food and entertainments. Both are excellent! > Try not to go AA though….
Not even for the extra legroom?
Response:
<deleted> Browse through some of the passenger opinions about BA and Virgin on the following website. http://www.airlinequality.com/Forum/seats.htm I have only BA. Virgin seems to have better equipment and food but one common theme across several opinions seem to be that Virgin flight attendants are too busy prancing around like models and less occupied with serving customers. BA flight attendants may not be models but they work harder with the customers. Both airlines generally are good bets. I would find it difficult to choose based on inflight experience. I choose BA because they go wherever I want to go. BA’s American partner is AA, so one can fly to and from many US cities to Europe by doing a AA/BA combination both of which have BA flight codes. Riaz
Response:
>> But both of those factors (coupled with the generally pleasanter atmosphere > on Virgin) made me choose Virgin whenever possible back when I used to fly > to London. > I find the Virgin atmosphere postively horrible, in fact my last flight > with them was bad enough that I threw away the 2nd leg of it, and chose a > different carrier for the journey rather than pay the change fee to get it > moved to when I needed it.
Wow, what happened? miguel — Hit The Road! Photos and tales from around the world: http://travel.u.nu
Response:
>>> But both of those factors (coupled with the generally pleasanter atmosphere >> on Virgin) made me choose Virgin whenever possible back when I used to fly >> to London. > I find the Virgin atmosphere postively horrible, in fact my last flight > with them was bad enough that I threw away the 2nd leg of it, and chose a > different carrier for the journey rather than pay the change fee to get it > moved to when I needed it. >Wow, what happened?
Very slow processing at JHB, late without any information leaving JHB, slow, very unfriendly cabin staff… although to be fair, whilst I had an onward leg LHR-JFK, it wasn’t actually very convenient (plans changed.) and probably would’ve cost me more and been a lot less convenient than LON-YVR I really wanted to do by the time the flight came round. Jim.
Response:
> 3. rent the gsm phone
Or buy a used unlocked one on ebay, and a SIM pack for about GBP 10 when you arrive. If you can’t find one already unlocked, get a Nokia – they’re easy to unlock (free) yourself. You’ll have the phone for future trips, or you can sell/lend it to someone else. It’s worth it for the convenience.
Response:
>But both of those factors (coupled with the generally pleasanter atmosphere >on Virgin) made me choose Virgin whenever possible back when I used to fly >to London.
I find the Virgin atmosphere postively horrible, in fact my last flight with them was bad enough that I threw away the 2nd leg of it, and chose a different carrier for the journey rather than pay the change fee to get it moved to when I needed it. Jim.
Response:
> Hi All: > I’ll be traveling to Heathrow in the middle of June, and it looks > like I can choose between BA and Virgin for my flights. Not to open > up any cans of worms, but is there any particular reason I should > choose one over the other? I.E., average seat pitch, etc. I’ll > most likely be stuck in coach.
BA have slighty better seat pitch. VS have fastly superior entertainment. VS have better food. > Secondarily – does anyone have a general idea of what phone calls > cost from London to the U.S.? I’m trying to find out if it’s > worth it for me to rent a GSM phone ( my current wireless provider > offers rentals at $3/day + $1.49/minute ), or just suck it up and > pay the probably rapacious hotel rates.
Buy a phone card it should cost about 5US cents a minute (cheaper than many calls within the UK).
Response:
> I’ll be traveling to Heathrow in the middle of June, and it looks > like I can choose between BA and Virgin for my flights. Not to open > up any cans of worms, but is there any particular reason I should > choose one over the other? I.E., average seat pitch, etc. I’ll > most likely be stuck in coach.
Seat pitch is the same on both. Virgin used to have better in-flight entertainment; not sure if they still do. British used to not take seat reservations for coach passengers; not sure if that’s still the case either. But both of those factors (coupled with the generally pleasanter atmosphere on Virgin) made me choose Virgin whenever possible back when I used to fly to London. > Secondarily – does anyone have a general idea of what phone calls > cost from London to the U.S.?
1p (1.7 cents)/minute (plus local call) if you get a cheap card. But really you can spend as much as you like. miguel — Hit The Road! Photos and tales from around the world: http://travel.u.nu
Response:
>> Secondarily – does anyone have a general idea of what phone calls >cost from London to the U.S.? I’m trying to find out if it’s >worth it for me to rent a GSM phone ( my current wireless provider >offers rentals at $3/day + $1.49/minute ), or just suck it up and >pay the probably rapacious hotel rates.
1. Have your current phone "unlocked" and buy a sim London, if you have an international GSM phone. You didn’t mention what kinf of phone you have or 2. Use a calling card and call the US for a few pence per minute. or 3. rent the gsm phone
Response:
> Hi All: > I’ll be traveling to Heathrow in the middle of June, and it looks > like I can choose between BA and Virgin for my flights. Not to open > up any cans of worms, but is there any particular reason I should > choose one over the other? I.E., average seat pitch, etc. I’ll > most likely be stuck in coach.
both have sub-average seat pitch. Is AA an option? – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Secondarily – does anyone have a general idea of what phone calls > cost from London to the U.S.? I’m trying to find out if it’s > worth it for me to rent a GSM phone ( my current wireless provider > offers rentals at $3/day + $1.49/minute ), or just suck it up and > pay the probably rapacious hotel rates. > Thanks, > - Rich
Response:
Hi All: I’ll be traveling to Heathrow in the middle of June, and it looks like I can choose between BA and Virgin for my flights. Not to open up any cans of worms, but is there any particular reason I should choose one over the other? I.E., average seat pitch, etc. I’ll most likely be stuck in coach. Secondarily – does anyone have a general idea of what phone calls cost from London to the U.S.? I’m trying to find out if it’s worth it for me to rent a GSM phone ( my current wireless provider offers rentals at $3/day + $1.49/minute ), or just suck it up and pay the probably rapacious hotel rates. Thanks, - Rich